Flat Fee vs. Per-Ticket Booking Fees: Which Wins?
Flat fee or per-ticket booking fees — which costs less? A quick worked example showing why per-ticket fees punish operators who grow.
For most growing operators, a flat fee wins. Per-ticket booking fees feel small per sale, but they scale with your volume, so success makes your bill bigger. A flat fee stays put while your revenue climbs. Here’s the math.
What’s the difference?
A per-ticket fee charges a set amount or percentage on every booking. A flat fee charges one predictable price, monthly or yearly, no matter how much you sell.
One scales with your growth. The other doesn’t. That’s the whole debate.
A simple worked example
Say you run a $90 tour and sell 1,000 tickets a month.
- Per-ticket at 6%: $90 × 6% = $5.40 per ticket. Over 1,000 tickets, that’s $5,400 a month.
- Flat fee: one set price, say a few hundred dollars, whether you sell 100 tickets or 5,000.
At low volume, per-ticket can look cheaper. But cross a few hundred bookings and flat pricing pulls ahead, hard.
Now double your sales next summer. The per-ticket bill doubles too. The flat fee doesn’t move.
So which wins?
If you’re growing, flat wins. You keep the upside of a great season instead of handing a slice to your software. The busier you get, the more obvious the gap becomes.
Per-ticket only stays cheaper if you stay small. That’s a strange thing to optimize for. We think your tools shouldn’t tax your growth. See how our pricing works.
Are per-ticket booking fees ever cheaper?
How do I compare flat vs. per-ticket fairly?
The right model depends on your volume, seasonality, and the services included. Compare the full picture before you decide. Talk with us about your operation.